Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luck (Jacob Yates and the Pearly Gate Lock Pickers album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merge discussion can occur on the talk page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Luck (Jacob Yates and the Pearly Gate Lock Pickers album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable album by a non-notable band. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NALBUMS and WP:Band. Secondary source coverage is trivial and fails WP:RS. Also nominated for deletion Jacob Yates and the Pearly Gate Lock Pickers as per above. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and merge the album article to the band article. Coverage in multiple reliable sources that is well beyond trivial. --Michig (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and merge per Michig. However, if the band obtains a history of issuing albums with similar independent coverage, separate articles will be warranted. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 22:06, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep without merge Strange nomination. Both articles satisfy WP:GNG and WP:MUS comfortably. Suggest that the nominator reviews WP:MUS. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 09:17, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.